Li Benchmarks

num_opt_line_search greenvalidity pass

Tier 1 · wall_time · N=num_opt_line_search · variant algo_registry · OS linux

passpass — perf claims allowed when ratio is green

Source: latest.csv:perf_present

Wall-clock row exists only — no explicit correctness signal yet.

Ratio vs best competitor: 0.922 (92.2% of rust speed) (table SOTA: rust — best competitor; charts use rust = 1.0)
Best competitor value: 0.0107 s

No analytical verify rows in ingest yet. Run tier-1 with --verify so latest.csv exports verify_ulps / verify_within_1ulp.

Problem size: N=num_opt_line_search (family num_opt_line_search)
Category: micro
Pillar: numerics
Package: lic
Li / catalog oracle (mean ± σ): 0.0116 ± 0.003091 s (n=74) / 0.0117 ± 0.001247 s (n=115) (cpp)
Ratio vs catalog oracle: 0.9915×
Best competitor: rust (0.0107 s)
Li relative speed vs SOTA: 0.922 (1.0 = rust speed)
Validity: validity pass
Threshold: 1.2×
Source: lic/benchmarks/workloads/tier1_micro/num_opt_line_search

PH ids: PH-5b

Compare oracle: cpp

Relative speed vs best competitor (rust) — SOTA = 1.0, higher is better. Absolute s values are in the table below.

Language comparison
Lang	Mean ± σ	Runs	Unit	Variant	OS
li	0.0116 ± 0.003091	74	s	release	linux
cpp	0.0117 ± 0.001247	115	s	release	linux
rust	0.0107 ± 0.000729	94	s	release	linux
julia	0.0117 ± 0.001262	91	s	release	linux
Metric: wall_time (value = mean of timed runs)